RADAR Europa
Grant€7,833,000

Online harms detection and investigation tools using a short development cycle model

Unknown buyer
● ForthcomingGrantUncategorised
What this is · Summarised by RADAR
Our words

The buyer is seeking online harms detection and investigation tools. These tools will be developed using a short development cycle model. The purpose is to detect and investigate online harms.

Original notice · VerbatimView on source

Expected Outcome: Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes: Police Authorities in Europe benefit from a rapid deployment of targeted detection and investigation tools and related training materials, specifically tailored to counter current, foreseeable and emerging online harms at the outset of each development cycle; Police Authorities in Europe are provided with a flexible framework for adaptation via creation of a modular toolset that allows for the incorporation of new functionalities and updates based on the latest trends and threats in online harms; Enhanced European stakeholder collaboration through facilitation of partnerships among researchers, policymakers, and Police Authorities in Europe to ensure that tools are not only effective but also user-friendly, legally and ethically sound. Scope: As the digital landscape continues to evolve, so too do the myriads of online harms that threaten citizens’ security and well-being. To address these challenges, we invite proposals for the development of detection and investigation tools that employ short development cycle models. This approach emphasizes agility and responsiveness, ensuring that tools can quickly adapt to emerging online threats, such as identity theft, disinformation, deepfakes, spoofing, phishing, digital violence, or, e.g., tools for an early detection as well as real-time monitoring and risk assessment that can identify potential fraudulent sales (“online payment fraud”) before they occur. This topic welcomes innovative ideas focused on creating efficient detection and investigation tools to combat varying forms of online harms, which should be selected at the beginning of every new development cycle, in agreement with all stakeholders involved in the consortia, especially including concrete needs of Police Authorities. The emphasis on short development cycles allows proposals to remain dynamic, responsive to the fast-paced nature of online threats, and capable of addressing both established issues and new challenges as they arise. Proposals should focus on the iterative process of tool development, integrating feedback from Police Authorities to ensure continuous improvement and relevance in combating online harms. Ultimately, the goal is to foster a proactive and effective response to safeguarding online spaces for all users, regardless of their gender identity or expression. Proposals are expected to provide ideas on how they would engage with the Europol Innovation Lab during the lifetime of the project. Furthermore, if the proposals concern drug-related issues, they are expected to engage with the EU Drugs Agency during the lifetime of the project, including validating the outcomes. For aspects of training of Police Authorities, cooperation of successful proposals with CEPOL is expected, provided that the Agency opts out from applying for funding. To ensure the active involvement of and timely feedback from relevant security practitioners, proposals should plan a mid-term deliverable consisting in the assessment of the project’s mid-term outcomes, performed by the practitioners involved in the project. Finally, proposals are expected to address all applicable considerations expressed in the Introduction of the Fighting Crime and Terrorism Destination. The project should have a minimum estimated duration of 48 months. Technology Readiness Level - Technology readiness level expected from completed projects Activities are expected to achieve TRL 6-8 by the end of the project – see General Annex B.

Reproduced verbatim from the official notice — only the wording is the source's; we split it into sections for readability.

Documents · 71
  • PDF · 5.4 MB
  • PDF · 1.6 MB
  • PDF · 1.0 MB
  • PDF · 1.1 MB
  • PDF · 1.4 MB
  • PDF · 906 KB
  • PDF · 1.1 MB
  • PDF · 1.5 MB
  • PDF · 1.3 MB
  • PDF · 1.4 MB
  • PDF · 253 KB
  • PDF · 1.1 MB
  • PDF · 323 KB
  • PDF · 425 KB
  • PDF · 533 KB
  • PDF · 1.2 MB
  • PDF · 620 KB
  • PDF · 1.2 MB
  • PDF · 968 KB
  • PDF · 1.3 MB
  • PDF · 1.9 MB
  • PDF · 1.6 MB
  • PDF · 5.5 MB
  • PDF · 5.5 MB
  • PDF · 1.0 MB
  • PDF · 632 KB
  • TXT · 11 KB
  • XLSM · 349 KB
  • PDF · 273 KB
  • PDF · 208 KB
  • PDF · 289 KB
  • PDF · 256 KB
  • PDF · 218 KB
  • PDF · 270 KB
  • PDF · 221 KB
  • PDF · 206 KB
  • PDF · 106 KB
  • PDF · 208 KB
  • PDF · 209 KB
  • PDF · 173 KB
  • PDF · 114 KB
  • PDF · 477 KB
  • PDF · 1.8 MB
  • DOCX · 50 KB
  • DOCX · 44 KB
  • PDF · 270 KB
  • PDF · 1.4 MB
  • PDF · 944 KB
  • PDF · 997 KB
  • PDF · 2.8 MB
  • PDF · 1.1 MB
  • PDF · 1.4 MB
  • PDF · 585 KB
Stop searching · Start receiving

We read all 24,507 of these. You get the ones that fit.

A curated shortlist scored against what your company actually does — in your inbox every Monday, 06:45. Reply to ask anything; answers in 15–30 minutes, with sources.

No card. No login. Cancel any time — one click, it's email.
Verification loads when you start typing